Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tommy Paul vs Ryan Peniston Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paul vs Peniston analysis and find out who is favored!
Tommy Paul vs Ryan Peniston Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Paul 1 - 0 Peniston
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul has won 55.16% of points on his second serve, while Peniston has won 51.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul, in recent form, has won 53.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Peniston has won 52.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.42% and 26.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paul has saved 66.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peniston has saved 42.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paul has won 63.89% of matches played (W/L 46/ 26), with Peniston winning 52.08% (W/L 25/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paul has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 121/ 67), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 61% (W/L 22/ 14). Peniston has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 151/ 81), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 54/ 46).
- Player level: In the last year, Paul has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 63.33% of matches (W/L 19/ 11), where as Peniston has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.5% of matches (W/L 23/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paul winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Paul winning 2 and Peniston winning 0. The last match between Paul and Peniston was at the Cary Challenger, 11-09-2019, Second, Hard with Tommy Paul getting the victory 6-4 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:35:48.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paul and Peniston have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paul winning 0 times and Peniston 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Paul winning 1, and Peniston 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul has played against opponents with an average rank of 143.11 while Peniston has played against players with an average rank of 238.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peniston has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul has converted 42.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peniston has converted 32.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
14
Rank
12
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
215
Rank
123
High
28
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
64% (404-231)
Career Total W/L
61% (287-187)
71% (20-8)
YTD W/L
30% (3-7)
$5,874,800
Career Prize Money
$221,850
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tommy Paul | Ryan Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:48 | 1:35:48 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (36/68) | 45% (37/83) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (27/36) | 68% (25/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (17/32) | 48% (22/46) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (36/83) | 35% (24/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Tommy Paul
Player
Ryan Peniston
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
11
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tommy Paul | Ryan Peniston |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (20/8) | 30% (3/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 69% (49/22) | 41% (9/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (369/288) | 46% (94/110) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (4/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 140 | 28 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 24 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:27 | 1:46:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 144.46 | 224.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1278/2101) | 56% (340/604) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (905/1278) | 69% (236/340) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (454/823) | 52% (136/264) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (96/228) | 32% (18/56) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (917/2187) | 37% (256/696) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 74% (17/23) | 33% (3/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 100% (3/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (21/18) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (21/2) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (6/0) |
Tommy Paul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Pedro Cachin
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
51 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Tommy Paul
66%
(
78 of
118)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
13
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
45 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
103
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Hubert Hurkacz
69%
(
81 of
117)
1st Serve %
54%
(
52 of
97)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
1
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
45%
(
53 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Daniil Medvedev
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Dominik Koepfer
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Aslan Karatsev
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Tommy Paul
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Lukas Klein
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
32 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Tommy Paul
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
53%
(
53 of
100)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
104
|
1-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ryan Peniston Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Ryan Peniston
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
104
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Buldorini
Player
Ryan Peniston
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
67%
(
12 of
18)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
10 of
20)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
51%
(
18 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
22
Total Points Won
31
|
2-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Ryan Peniston
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Ryan Peniston
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Gijs Brouwer
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Ryan Peniston
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Elias Ymer
52%
(
50 of
96)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
112)
3
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Ryan Peniston
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
4
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Vs Peniston Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tommy Paul
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
